Skip to main content

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: orchiddoctor Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:50am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Mort's Choice v. 3 2-14-68




Good Morning Little Schoolgirl, Morning Dew, Dark Star, China Cat Sunflower, The Eleven, Turn On Your Lovelight Cryptical Envelopment-> The Other One-> Cryptical Envelopment-> New Potato Caboose-> Born Cross-Eyed-> Spanish Jam, Alligator-> Drums-> Alligator-> Caution (Do Not Stop on Tracks), E: Midnight Hour

St. Valentine's Day. 2-14. Always a big day for the Dead.
2-14-67: the great Be In. A fine show 2-14-69 in Philly. 2-14-70? You know where!

But shall we go, you and I, back to the Carousel Ballroom, 2-14-68. The hallowed grounds of the Carousel, a dance hall whose history is just beginning. A time when the Dead were just beginning too--blossoming as a psychedelic monster with muscle enough to lift the entire hall and whisk it away to another time and space.

At the end of 1967 through the early months of 1968, the Dead were recording their experimental l.p., Anthem of the Sun. As most of you know, it was "composed" of snippets from
many of these shows. The Caution comes from 11-10-67 and the
2/23/68 Kings Beach Bowl DP22.

2-14-68 provides a huge part of Anthem. The Alligator segment from the beginning of the drums section through the beginning of the final banshee cries is what you hear on Anthem--albeit in a truncated form. But here, you will get to hear the whole thing in all its glory.

This clean. clear soundboard begins with some good ol' Pig performing his standard of the time, Schoolgirl. This is a tough, gritty performance which announces that the band is indeed here and ready for bid'ness. Morning Dew follows. I can tell by reading the threads here that noone likes Morning Dew very much (HA!); this is an exceptional uptempo performance which is reflective of this play with speed era. Next comes an early Dark Star sequence. The Star, at 4:10 is not yet exploratory. It is embryonic, but you can sense the cosmic overtones and the potential it has for development. Itg segues into a prototypic China Cat-- a little sloppy, but enthusiastic (remember--these were new songs!) which bounces into a brief but screaming Eleven, finally landing in a superb Lovelight. While not as long and deep as 1969 Dark Star suites, this one shows the boys as they begin to learn how to explore the great musical unknown.

The next set (which followed a set by Country Joe and the Fish) is the stuff of legend. Literally. Supposedly, Jerry went up to Phil between sets and, dissatisfied with his lackluster playing (seems fine to me), threw him down the back stairs. (I believe that Phil has it as the 16th, but legend is legend). Regardless, Phil begins to take over as the second set progresses. Now, mind you, the vocals from this time period are a bit, shall we say, piss poor (hence the overdubs in the studio--a practice they would continue with for years), the playing is superb. The Other One suite is fast and furious, and, vocals aside, New Potato Caboose and Born Cross Eyed are played with youthful intensity (portions of them are on Anthem). But the highlight of this suite is the Spanish Jam that follows. Rising slowly out of the ashes of Born Cross Eyed and led by Phil, it is an acid drenched exploration of the sort of stuff Miles Davis was into at the time.


Take a deep breath: Here comes the Alligator!

As per usual, it begins sloppily, the vocals being horrible throughout. Then the drums come: the drums!. The prototypic four handed monster that mounts a percussive attack that just doesn't give up. Bobby chants his "C'mon everybody, get up and dance, it won't ruin ya!" and Jerry and Bobby do their "Alligator running 'round my door." Then Jerry starts to solo over the drums, a little tentatively at first, and then, bam--it's the jam you hear on Anthem. Here, Phil shines as brightly as Phil can shine. His powerful leads enter into a dance with Jerry's, a dance fueled by the fire of the drummers. Who can tell the dancer from the dance? This passage is one of the most incredible jams the boys ever performed--ever. On Anthem, the jam cuts, just after the "mountain" theme is played. Here it goes on for another minute. The Caution that follows ain't no slouch; it carries the intensity forward admirably. The feedback is typical for the time; you either like it or you don't. The Midnight Hour encore, apparently from a weaker source. It almost seems anticlimactic--an afterthought to the amazing voyage that has just taken place--but don't ignore it. It stands up well and shows Pig at his finest.

This, to me, is the best from a great time in the band's career. They have just emerged from the primal ooze and are reliquishing their gills as they grow feet. Six months later, those feet would flying in another direction--one that would define the band forever.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Arbuthnot Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:37pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Mort's Choice v. 3 2-14-68

"But shall we go, you and I, ...."

thanks for the t.s.e. reference. i believe jer appreciated his writing as well.

due to access, i can only really post at night, but a very fine show, and one of the first i streamed when i discovered the archive. and one of the first shows i sought out in lossless. regarding the # of replies and views of a particular thread, the reason is likely deeper than you imagine if you think about it, and therein lies your answer.

This post was modified by Arbuthnot on 2006-12-29 01:37:35

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: high flow Date: Dec 28, 2006 3:42pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=69570

The link above will direct you to the original Oprah thread.

Many issues regarding a common, weekly show were discussed. Some issues include, who will pick the show, how will we choose that person and what standard will that person be held to. If anyone is interested.

Both Orchid and Dr Flashback have done admirable jobs. IT is a tough task.

Interest has clearly waned and a change of format is necessary.

Here is what I propose...

Each week, we nominate a chooser. Anybody on the forum. Old, young, willing or unwillng. That person picks a show, from any era. Perhaps a favorite. Perhaps a least-favorite!!(yeah, pick a show that you think sucks!) No pressure.

No descriptions or 'selling' of the show is necessary! Just the date and thinks to where it can streamed or dl'd.

This format allows the listener to arrive at the show without preconceptions. AND, this allows the listener to praise or trash the show without offending the chooser.

Any takers? Or, should we just let the weekly-listen whither and die??

This post was modified by high flow on 2006-12-28 23:36:07

This post was modified by high flow on 2006-12-28 23:42:29

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dancinbears Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:17pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

not sure if anyone wants my opinion, or not, but I like this idea High Flow...especially if this means others who don't normally post will participate too.
Maybe it doesn't have to be a set weekly thing thou... then it might feel like work instead of enjoyment.

"maybe only as you are inspired." a little bit of a quote that I just read from Old NJ Head's post... but maybe this could be for everyone.

This post was modified by Dancinbears on 2006-12-29 00:17:50

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:35pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

See? I knew you weren't the problem...nor was Robbie (hope he doesn't dislike that nickname). You two took the time to kick it around, chime in, whatever...all that the doc's detailed commentary req'd was an acknowledgement...you two did that. Others ignored it. That's okay, but just not what I think is required to make this kind of forum work, you know? What if when you responded I simply ignored it? Of course that wouldn't happen between us, but the doc was putting himself on the line, and then the second time around he gets the response he did...the folks reading shoud've responded...

My sermon; done.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:55pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

William - I guess you can't force people to respond, like you can't coerce them into voting. There have been times when I've posted something I thought was pretty good only to see it read a half dozen times. Those are the breaks my friend. Sometimes you preach to the choir, sometimes you cry in the wilderness.

Hey William - just noticed, if you look on the main Archive page there's a post in the Education forum - 3301 views and one reply - and you thought we were bad, huh?

This post was modified by robthewordsmith on 2006-12-29 00:55:39

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 8:28pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

Hey?! How come you can say this so much better than I?

Get some sleep--you have done yourself and this forum a service tonight; by being a part of the fray, at least you didn't phone it in...hmmm, metaphorical breakdown.

Whoaaa--your edit is too damn funny...well, okay, sad.

This post was modified by William Tell on 2006-12-29 04:28:16

This post was modified by William Tell on 2006-12-29 04:28:43

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 3:57pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

My vote is for wither and die and stick with the friendly bullshitting. What is this anyway - gig of the month club?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:06pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

Whoa...harsh, my friend...harsh. Methinks you spoke too soon, to quote you loosely...Anyhooo, I hope so.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:21pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

Didn't mean to come across harsh, William. Just never found the idea of this month's set topic for discussion too appealing. That's just me, buddy.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:27pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

No sweat; just feeling bad for the guy...we probably agree on most of this shit...take care, WT

Plus, my mistake...didn't see that HF had used the 'whither and die' phrase so it seemed harsh. My bad, my friend.

This post was modified by William Tell on 2006-12-29 00:27:15

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:34pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

It's sometimes hard to keep track of the ins and outs of the conversation that goes on here. I wouldn't feel bad about missing something, William - you're one of the most thoughtful and astute guys on the forum. You take csre too, buddy.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: high flow Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:07pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

16 weeks appears to be the shelf-life of such an experiment...I get it. Sorry Dire, no drinks on me...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:51pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

what????? you lost me....

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: high flow Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:02pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

If we make 52 weeks, the drinks are on me! You hear that Dire? ON ME!

Does that ring a bell?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:24pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 2 Thumbs crossed - A solution?

oh shit - that slipped my mind - now i remember - lol - we gotta keep that goin - i'm in!!!!! thanks for the recall my friend :)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 7:29am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Mort's Choice v. 3 2-14-68

Ah--back to the music with gusto. Thanks, Doc; a nice morning read (your review & comments)...I know this one well, but will gladly pull it out and give it another listen.

Appreciate your time and thoughtfulness.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: dyermaker81 Date: Dec 28, 2006 6:59am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Mort's Choice v. 3 2-14-68

Great pick doc! It just so happens that I put this on the IPOD yesterday and was very pleased. 68 really had some tremendous stuff and this is definitely a highlight!

Thanks Man!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: stratocaster Date: Dec 28, 2006 8:36pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Mort's Choice v. 3 2-14-68

2-14-68 was the first tape I ever got from 68'...until that point my only exposure was either anthem or the 2 from the vault release...great spanish jam...tis a shame the Dead and Miles did anything together...personally I don't delve much into 60s Dead...but this might inspire me to break out some of my old chestnuts...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: orchiddoctor Date: Dec 28, 2006 1:04pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: three thumbs down

When I offered to present a weekly favorite, I did so with no pretension of taking the place of the one who originated the concept. Dr. F. is a true student of Deadology and has a firm grasp of the whole canon. AND, he writes reviews of actual shows on a regular basis. Good stuff.

I figure I'm stepping on some toes. Or the board doesn't really care about the actual shows, just the minutiae that they can find in the annals of the Dead. It's disheartening to get 46 hits and two responses to a short presentation on a historic and superb show while such earth shaking links as favorite intros and covers we wish they did (over 300 hits) or best segue between Scarlet Begonias and Fire on the Mountain.
And, by they way, these are fine threads and worth the read.

But all too often, this board becomes a place for a handful of regulars to either digress within a thread or withhold commentary for all but the posts in their circle. I can understand why "lurkers" don't post that often.

I guess the point is that it just doesn't seem worth it to investigate, listen to, and critique shows when that is clearly not the purpose of this board.

And, so I turn it back over to you and, like the rest of you, eagerly await the return of the prodigal Dr. Flashback.

Meanwhile, how about a thread on Bobby's hairstyles? Should he have cut his hair? Did he wreck it with too many blow dryers?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cush11 Date: Dec 28, 2006 10:12pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

I'm sorry you feel that way Doc... I think it was VERY community minded of you to offer to step in and do, I think, A fine job of subbing for dr flashback in his absense! I enjoying reading the descriptions and details (only had time to skim this mornings, but will get to it) and appreciate the thought and effort put into them!!! I don't always listen to them, but I do have a list of "get to one of these days" shows almost 4 pages long in Word now. I 'm sure I don't listen to the Dead as much as most here, nowhere near like I used to! I miss the Grateful Dead so much still, that it's hard for still to listen too much ( I average 2 or 3 maybe 4 shows a week). I also really miss the community and comradery that always, yes even still in the 90's, surrounded the Dead and has been part, no, most of my life for almost 40 of my (approaching) 55 years. That's what I find so appealing about this forum, we can talk GD, we can dissect GD, share our stories and yes, even just have fun and clown around with kindred spirits...

OK, I'm getting longwinded and need to post the Grok time! I hope you will join in, I know there is still some interest... I saw furthur down the threads about it going by the wayside... It hasn't! Thanks again Doctor O, I've enjoyed getting acquainted with you, and all the fine people here! Catch you later, J

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: gmcgill Date: Dec 28, 2006 1:16pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

For what it's worth, when I read your post, I immediately noted that I had said show on my computer and spent a glorious afternoon listening to the show. Your commentary made it much more enjoyable. I'm a particular fan of 60s and early 70s (first show was 12/26/69 in Dallas). I'm mostly a lurker here and at LMA in general. You'll find that most of my posts are trying to help lost souls figure out how to get music from the archive to their IPOD. Sometimes this is very frustrating (i.e., "what do you mean by 'right click' on the file"). But when it finally works for someone after 17 messages, I feel I've done my duty to spread the joy of live music.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 1:57pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

I have appreciated your efforts more than once as I am just past learning about 'right clicking'...thanks.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 1:57pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Sorry, Doc; you tried. I have noticed the disparity in posting topic wise...seems like the Grok has suffered the same fate.

Folks sometimes are a bit insensitive to the efforts of others, as we discussed back a week or two ago. I fear we have lost a few valued members as a result.

Hang in there my friend.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Old_NJ_Head_Zimmer Date: Dec 28, 2006 3:52pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Hey Doc - sorry to hear your stopping. I appreciate and always give your posts a read. I'm not a big poster because I only have time to check in once in a while and it does get discouraging sometimes to have to sort throught the mess to find musical topics.

I know the only reason I come to this board is to learn and share about GD and other good music. As far as being a place to just chat every day about whatever comes up, well I would rather just call someone and have the conversation. IMO, It's nicer to hear the voice.

I wish you would reconsider. Or at least don't hold yourself to a weekly post, maybe only as you are inspired.

Thanks Bro!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:08pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

I second that...but I fear no one is reading now anyhow...Nice effort though.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 2:15pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

In no way do I want to cause offense to those who take the time to give us their thoughtful, detailed and considered opinions on shows that they'd like to share with us. The thing is that I don't come here to find detailed breakdowns on Dead performances - it's all just too damn subjective - but to pick up on the sense of community that binds us together. I like the give and take, the putdowns, the jibes, the back-up, the friendliness, the sharing. I like the rapid fire repartee. I like to cherry pick - I like to go out and listen to my fifty-seventh Jack Straw because somebody whose opinion I respect said it was the best Jack Straw they ever heard. I don't want to listen to a whole show like it was homework and I was being set a Dead test. That's why I never listened to a single Oprah. But that's nothing against Dr Flashback - I had a couple of exchanges with him and found him to be a good and generous man. I wish him well and look forward to his return to the forum.

That's it - said my piece.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: orchiddoctor Date: Dec 28, 2006 2:40pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Well put--that seems to be the purpose here--nice friendly chat about nothing in particular. What is the best "Jack Straw"?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: bluedevil Date: Dec 28, 2006 2:50pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

appropos of nothing in particular . . .
http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=89261

Is this a take home exam?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 3:11pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

you'll notice I took no part in that one ...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 2:48pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

What's wrong with nice friendly chat about nothing in particular - alongside the odd well-aimed rabble-rousing barb? :-)

The 'best' Jack Straw is the one that rocks you today - even though it might leave you unmoved tomorrow...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dancinbears Date: Dec 28, 2006 3:25pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

"The 'best' Jack Straw is the one that rocks you today - even though it might leave you unmoved tomorrow..."

I must say, that was put beautifully! :)

So, 'much talk about nothing' might be somewhat my fault, as I have come on here and asked everything under the planet of you guys... age, occupation, family history, etc. and have gotten some of you to lighten up and therefore fall a little off the grateful dead track. Somebody once said that a forum was like the parking lot before the show.... did you talk about nothing but the dead there? I think not. you probably bullshitted about everything, around the grateful dead and why you were there. Hope the fact that we steer off course a lot is okay. It can be fun to get into back and forth chatter about nonsense.

On the other hand, in case I haven't memtioned, what I do when there's a thread like the Jack Straw example... I copy & paste, and then print notes, and if I haven't heard that version I will sometimes seek it out. And if I don't have that show, it goes on my list to look for with a little note next to it why and what to listen for. You should see the pages of notes I have. So keep talking. About everything. :)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:07pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Thank you, Dancinbears. I think this may be our first direct contact, so hello to you! I agree that getting to know a little about the person behind the viewpoint can be illuminating. I think we're all dyed in the wool bullshitters to a certain extent - but hey, that's human nature. I'm always happy to go off course - sometimes you end up in more interesting place.

Don't know about this copying and pasting notes idea though. Hell, I don't even take a shopping list to the supermarket. Must be why I forget the milk so often...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dancinbears Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:19pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

well hello robthewordsmith... we get our chance to talk. :)

I come on this forum and 'bullshit' probably more than anybody, but I honestly read almost all the threads. I cannot begin to tell you how much I've learned too! I know the 'lists' thing might sound like work to you, but trading (and sharing) is my hobby and it equals fun and enjoyment for me. Just had to have a way to remember things... and scribbling on paper just wasn't doing it anymore!

But the bullshitting and making friends part... that makes me get off the computer with a smile on my face! :)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:30pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Dancinbears - I'm just a disorganised guy I guess. Last I heard they couldn't shoot your for it! I know what you mean about a smile on your face - the number of times I've left this forum with laughter bubbling inside... There are good times to be had here. Glad to share them with you.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dancinbears Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:36pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Thank you Rob... because of the things that happened when I first got here, I cannot begin to tell you how nice that was to read. :)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:51pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Dancinbears you are very welcome. Going to bed soon but I look forward to further discussions!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: orchiddoctor Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:18pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Just to respond and hopefully end this thread: I don't have a problem with anything. Once in a while you can get shown the light and all that. The board should be for fun and fun can lead to knowledge.

I think the idea of simply sharing something that just blew you away is better than presenting shows in some sort of pedantic manner. It seems to turn people off. I think some of the silliest posts get the best responses.

And, yes, Dancinbears, the best Jack Straw is the one you are listening to. Everything else is completely subjective anyway. I love the early stuff, others the later stuff. It's all good. And if it didn't change over the years, it would have been a long, dull trip.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 3:36pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Hey Dancin and Robthe; two people I do respect...but you would not really be unmoved the next day (what is good has to stand the test of time; it is not entirely subjective or we wouldn't have so many people agreeing...people that do matter)...what matters matters, and you should consider that, and then reconsider the doc's plight...

No big deal--you two aren't the problem; you two are part of the solution, but it just isn't gonna work today.

And I don't think the doc would have a problem with anything either of you every posted...all he needed was a response, out of simple politeness. His detailed comments warranted that...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:14pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

William - I repect you deeply, my friend, but yes I do think it is largely (though not entirely) subjective. So much depends on your mood when you're listening. What matters matters today - but might not so much tomorrow. Maybe more so for me than for you. I should stop talking nonsense and go to bed I guess - gone midnight here now.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:20pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

gee WT - noticed i wasnt included - lol - now i know where i stand with you (as if i didnt) hah !

This post was modified by direwolf0701 on 2006-12-29 01:20:33

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:03pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Whoops...missed you there...say something really cantankerous...or correct that spelling, and I will get back to you.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:21pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

spelling corrected - not into anything cantankerous lately - still know how i am taken here by you, orthodoc, and others, not much i can do about it at this point. it is what it is after 4 years on this forum. ive made my bed.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:37pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Hey guy--not true...at least from this end. I missed your post only because I think it moved down in the thread, but I did read it when I returned...my mistake.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:44pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

oh - thought there were some negative vibes from you toward me in the past???? i'm almost sure of it (not vitriolic by any means) - maybe i am mistaken??? i was kinda being a brat in this instance by saying you left me out. was only playin' - enjoy readin your posts though my friend.

but i truly had the feeling you have thought i have been nothing but a jerk (which if fine - to each his own) - much like orthodoc does

(and ducats, which is fine because i think he is too).

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dancinbears Date: Dec 28, 2006 5:54pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Hey Dire, maybe the same way some people think you are a jerk (and they're wrong because I know you aren't), you might be wrong about them too.

It's hard to judge people only by what you read, because it all comes down to HOW you read it.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 6:41pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

very true my friend - i don't mind certain people thinking i am a jerk though on this forum - keeps a certain mystery and fun to it. kinda feel bad WT thinks i am though - i kinda like him - that has been my fault i think.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 7:47pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Very well said, DB...I have so often re-read my own posts to see how it could have been interpreted and been shocked that I could have been sooo stupid to write it so...

You are a kind soul that I hope continues to play an important role here.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dancinbears Date: Dec 28, 2006 7:53pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Thank you William... :)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 8:07pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

"kind soul?" (cough cough - hack...%#@(*&^)

oh sorry - an almond got stuck in my throat

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 6:11pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Dire--again, my friend (if I may), not my intention. You have made clear your penchant for a humorist post now and again, and a quick temper when wronged, but I have not had such feelings for you, and am sorry if it came across as such.

No, I think of you as the first person, along with Ian, to offer me music with no expectation of return...That counts for something.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 6:45pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

cool WT - i may have misinterpreted a couple of posts here and there (easy to do with the written work within the confines of a forum). I have always hoped to consider you a forum friend too, even when we disagree regarding certain issues (hope i have never been rude toward you - don't think i have). You are a GREAT contributor here and I hope if I give a playful jab here and there you know I respect you for what you bring here.

Peace my friend

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 28, 2006 7:49pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Cool; thanks for taking the time to respond.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Dec 28, 2006 4:59pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

Hopefully Dire old buddy you'll be able to stand on your own two legs before too long.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Dec 28, 2006 2:52pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

how is talking about individual songs or interesting sugues "nice friendly chat about nothing in particular"? (not trying to be a jerk) - also, i agree with rob to a certain extent - friendly banter is fun and breaks up a day.

i also don't often stream full shows - i am so backed up with all the great shows people have mailed me, it would be rude of me to stream here while putting their hard work on the backburner and ignoring what they gave/traded me.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: bluedevil Date: Dec 28, 2006 1:33pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: three thumbs down

also fwiw, I actually cut and pasted what you said and printed to keep as one to get in the future since the same was not available for streaming.

More mousse would have helped with the excessive blow drying, and yes, the beard should go.